Abstract

The paper examines the “I” and its relationship to the stream of consciousness in Husserl’s genetic phenomenology. Examining the manuscripts from the late 1910s to the early 1930s, the source of the alleged inconsistencies concerning Husserlian egology is found in the failure to distinguish the twofold movement – deconstructive and reconstructive – of genetic analysis. Starting from this methodological distinction, the fundamental continuity of Husserl’s reflection on the ego and the progressive integration and concretization of Ichfrage and Zeitfrage is revealed. The status of the notion of Ur-Ich and the genesis of the ego as such can thus be clarified in perspectival terms. The phenomenon of centralization (Zentralisierung) of intentional life establishes, within the stream of consciousness, a point of view (focus) that coincides with the actualization in the foreground (Vordergrund) of the thematic lived experience on the basis of a merely operative and potential background (Hintergrund).

Limited Access

by Andrea Altobrando

In this article I try to illustrate the reasons why Husserl included such a metaphysically challenging concept as the monad in his phenomenology. I will first offer a brief historical reconstruction of that path that led Husserl to such an introduction, and then focus on some key features of the Husserlian monad (immortality and unbornness, epistemic substantiality, plurality of monads, and uniqueness of the objective world). I will finally turn to a reflection concerning the phenomenological tenability of Husserlian monadology and weigh its merits and shortcomings.

read more